Widely known translation was you to definitely Angie try Angela Bowie herself, having just who Jagger purportedly (also) carried on an event

Widely known translation was you to definitely Angie try Angela Bowie herself, having just who Jagger purportedly (also) carried on an event

Angela Bowie’s revelations to the Joan Streams Inform you provided specific so you’re able to imagine that the eponymous “Angie” wasn’t Angela, however, David Bowie.

Another preferred rumor was one “Angie” got regarding Angela Richards, Keith Richards’ child of the celebrity Anita Pallenberg. (It was a tremendously foolish rumor, just like the Angela Richards are less than a year old when the Moving Stones recorded “Angie.” It’s just not also likely that Mick Jagger just made use of her label to your song’s identity, as the she was in the first place titled Dandelion from the their mothers up to she insisted to the label Angela decade afterwards.)

Were unsuccessful like circumstances while the conveyed in tune words only hold appeal to own such a long time, but a good salacious rumor in the stars engaging in a gay coupling often alive as long as you will find men and women to repeat they

  • A new rumor had they one “Angie” involved Anita Pallenberg, who’d flings which have each other Rolling Stones users Brian Jones and Mick Jagger as well as a multi-year experience of Keith Richards.

When a musician composes a tune regarding an unsatisfied love affair which have an effective female’s term to have a concept, we imagine it ought to was indeed determined of the an excellent real-lifetime relationship that have some one of the term (especially if it turns out he knew a lady entitled you to, it doesn’t matter exactly who she was at their existence). But really this can be not true; songwriters consistently pen performs where labels and you will info is selected once the they fit the brand new meter of your structure. Although the track alone may be the catharsis from profoundly-believed personal anxiety indicated given that a specific (yet totally fictional) outpouring, otherwise is a genuine chronicle regarding a hurtful experience endured, it doesn’t always go after your gal whom stirred up those people thoughts in the real life might be considering the same identity about track. Autobiography simply happens up to now – when your meter is not best, title happens.

Songwriters supply composed pieces created as much as certain brands merely due to the fact it preferred the newest sound of them: Friend Holly did understand an excellent “Peggy Sue” (brand new wife of drummer Jerry Allison), however the song was not considering people actual-lifestyle relationship ranging from this lady and Friend. Sometimes musicians just build because of their viewers, churning away works one to expound abreast of common skills the musical-to get societal often select which have (eg heartwrenching partings). To possess such as products, the fresh eponymous girl need not become anyone genuine, since publisher is actually contacting upon universal layouts for the material out of his track.

But really speculation along side name of “Angie” regarding Rolling Brick glory possess long-past ceased to get an productive material, an effective quieting out-of wagging tongues having yet that occurs to your original rumor, that Mick Jagger and David Bowie with intimate knowledge of both

Is actually “Angie” on any one person, or is actually title simply plucked from the sky? Do not discover. However, i do know for sure enough about songs not to immediately end you to definitely a track called with a beneficial women’s name setting the author had an unhappy experience in a woman of these name.

However, while the denials commonly almost given that interesting because gossip, brand new story one “the head Brick was also resting which have [Angela’s] husband” spread everywhere. Angela upcoming muddied the difficulty actually ever after that along with her 1993 share with-all guide Backstage Seats, where she disingenuously chided individuals to own just in case exactly what she had however meant to imply, while nonetheless admitting one she by herself nevertheless considered exactly what anyone had believed: