H. naledi exhibits anatomical features distributed to Australopithecus, other features distributed to Homo, with several features maybe not if not understood in virtually any hominin varieties. The newest morphology of the cranium, mandible, and you will dentition is mainly consistent with the genus Homo, nevertheless brain sized H. naledi is in the a number of Australopithecus. The low limb is largely Homo-particularly, in addition to foot and you will ankle have become individual inside their setup, although hips appears to be flared significantly like that off Au. afarensis. New arms, hands, and you may proportions of the newest fingers are mutual mainly that have Homo, nevertheless the proximal and you can intermediate tips guide phalanges are significantly curved, also in order to an increased education compared to people Australopithecus. The newest shoulders was designed mainly like those off australopiths. The new backbone are extremely the same as Pleistocene members of the new genus Homo, whereas the fresh ribcage are wide distally such Bien au. afarensis.
H. naledi provides 
Regression equations demonstrated inside the ‘Material and you can methods’. Size (a) based on forensic statures off Western european anybody. Bulk (b) considering numerous population test. Both prices diverge a little having quicker femora.
Limitation tibia size into the H. naledi and other hominins.
Restriction tibia size getting You.W. 101-484, than the other almost done hominin tibia specimens. Australopithecus afarensis represented by the A beneficial.L. 288-step one and you may KSD-VP-step one/step one (Haile-Selassie et al., 2010); Homo erectus represented by D3901 off Dmanisi and you will KNM-WT 15000; Homo habilis by the OH thirty five; Homo floresiensis because of the LB1 and LB8 (Brownish ainsi que al., 2004; Morwood mais aussi al., 2005). Chimpanzee and you may modern Western european origins human beings from Cleveland Museum of Natural Records (Lee, 2001); Andaman Islanders of Inventory (2013). Straight contours portray take to selections; bars show 1 simple deviation.
The latest endocranial number of most of the H. naledi specimens is brief as compared to really identified examples of Homo. I joint guidance about most complete cranial vault specimens to help you reach a quotation away from endocranial volume for both large (allegedly male) and you can reduced (presumably females) people (larger substance depicted from inside the Contour 11). The fresh ensuing rates of around 560cc and you will 465cc, correspondingly, convergence completely on the variety of endocranial volumes recognized for australopiths. Within the genus Homo, just the smallest specimens out of H. habilis, a unitary H. erectus specimen, and you may H. floresiensis convergence with this opinions.
Digital reconstruction of endocranium of big compound cranium from DH1 and you can DH2 overlaid towards the ectocranial counters.
Even after their short container proportions, the fresh new cranium out of H. Front bossing is obvious, as it is reasonable amount of parietal bossing. There’s absolutely no manifestation of metopic keeling, however, there was moderate parasagittal keeling ranging from bregma and you may lambda, and lots of prelambdoidal flattening. The newest cranial vault skeleton are often thin, become some weightier about occipital area. The latest supraorbital torus is ripped, in the event weakly curved, and that’s bounded posteriorly from the a properly-create supratoral sulcus. The fresh lateral edges of your own supraorbital torus are rounded and you can seemingly thin. The newest temporal contours try commonly spaced, and there is zero sign of a sagittal crest or temporal/nuchal cresting. This new temporary crest is located to your rear facet of the horizontal supraorbital torus, as opposed to towards premium element such as australopiths.